Marcelo Guimarães Lima
Art Dubai 2012The sixth edition of Art Dubai closed Saturday, the 24th of March 2012. What is the balance of this major annual event for the visual arts in the city of Dubai? Art Dubai is an art fair whose main purpose is to bring galleries together with collectors, sellers and buyers of art. Around the commerce of contemporary artworks, an art forum discussing contemporary art issues and other activities, of a more or less cultural, critical, pedagogical character, were organized. The art forum and other activities however remained tangential, secondary to the main focus of Art Dubai, which is, the financial aspects within and around the contemporary art world: trading, owning, collecting, appraising, etc. In this, we can say that Art Dubai is perhaps closer to its “sister” event in Abu Dhabi, the annual Art Abu Dhabi exhibition, and somewhat distant from the model of the Sharjah Biennial, which is conceived as an international showcase of contemporary art focusing on artworks and their producers, in the context of ideas and, theoretically as well as de facto, on the institutional issues and problems of art today. Could we say therefore that these three major artistic events in the UAE are complementary? Not exactly. In fact, these initiatives, which run parallel to each other, share no synergies.

Works by M. F. Hussain

Burhan Kum
That a predominantly commercial art fair is the main visual arts event in Dubai could be questioned in relation to future developments in the contemporary art scene in this city that has embraced global exchanges, in finance and in commerce, as the source of its material energies, present and future, beyond the oil economy that made possible the initial phases of economic growth and development.
In fact, in the commonly called immaterial economy of the 21st century the role of ideas, in the (believe it or not) interrelated fields of science, the arts, the technological domains, in short, what we can call the cultural sphere at large, is more and more evidently crucial for the production and distribution of wealth in its double, interrelated, inseparable material and moral dimensions as, more than ever, a global process. A process in which local actors (countries, states, peoples, corporations, institutions, etc.) become equally responsible within an international configuration of economic activities, and their concomitant or interrelated political, ideological, etc., components, and must share benefits and costs alike. In such a context, cultural development becomes a decisive element, perhaps the decisive issue of our times.

Mounir Fatmi

Francisco Faria
By cultural development we mean the growing knowledge and awareness of ourselves and of our world. Cultural development is the development of the instruments of knowledge of the real issues confronting us today, as opposed to the myths, false questions and false antagonisms, cultivated and manipulated ignorance and obscurantism, as against the interested misrepresentations and the self-serving illusions that may and in fact do divide us in a time of crucial choices and vital challenges. Cultural development is the promotion of all the domains of activities, institutional structures and disciplines of thought that contribute to the development of real knowledge about ourselves, and about our real conditions (as opposed to our imagined conditions). Among those, the arts.

installation / performance by Marya Kazoun

Arash Hanaei
Art is the domain in which the interrelated internal and external conflicts and antagonisms that challenge and divide the human being, the struggles that constitute the process of individual growth and social development, its energies, possibilities and risks, are brought to consciousness in more or less indirect ways. That is, they are represented and therefore made into objects of possible knowledge and oriented actions: a sentient knowledge, which is the symbolic knowledge of the cultural order; a concrete knowledge of our universal nature that allows us to represent to ourselves our choices, our past and our intended future, uniting the emotional life of the mind and the mindful dimension of our emotional experiences.
The matter of culture, broadly defined, has always been that crucial, and yet it becomes even more crucial in our globalized times. With the exponential development of technology, breaking the confinements of established social, economic and political practices and structures, we confront the growth of historical challenges, demanding ever more comprehensive answers to ever more pressing and global, that is inclusive, complex and large-scale problems.
And so with art, whose present context is no less dramatic than that of the culture at large. As it happens, the hedonist vision of art takes the part for the whole. Indeed, what we may call, a strategy of seduction is at work even in the most aggressive or disruptive works of art of our time. Art works are embodiments of our emotional life as symbolized and represented affects. They cannot escape the “aesthetic laws” of matter that has been “impregnated” with affective and intellectual meanings, although these “laws” themselves, by nature never completely codified, change or mutate in time. And yet, the systematic confusion between means and ends makes even the grain of truth in hedonist theories irrelevant to the understanding of the tensions and dilemmas within the contemporary field of the arts.

Alfred Tarazi

William Kentridge
Since Kant and Hegel we have known that modernity is self-reflective, that the knower is part of (his) knowledge, and that true knowledge gives us, in a self-reflective manner, with the objects of knowledge themselves, its own conditions of possibility, the conditions of possibility of these objects. And so with art, whose “loss of innocence” that came about in the mid and late 19th century lead to the “loss of evidence” theorized by Adorno in the late 20th century. By “innocence” we mean art’s ignorance or misrepresentation of its own condition of possibility. “Loss of evidence” refers to Adorno’s notion of the radical social-historic transformations in the 20th century, the advent of the administered society and its ideological arm: the cultural industry, challenging the very conditions of possibility of art, its concept and practice.
At this point it may appears that I have been carried away with theoretical considerations and have stranded from my initial question about the balance of Art Dubai 2012. In fact I have not, I believe this is the very heart of the matter. Art Dubai 2012 in a sense repeats Art Dubai 2011, 2010, and so on. And that may be the actual proof of a successful formula, no doubt. Art Dubai is an international art show with clear limits to what it proposes to do in fact, if not in the manner of its self-presentation. The commerce of art is perhaps a necessary thing if artists are to live off their works, although as the world changes, the very conditions of possibility of the profession of visual artist change, and artists are more and more challenged to reinvent themselves and their profession. The commerce of art by itself is certainly not a sufficient condition for art to take root, to expand and grow. More is needed for the development of contemporary visual arts in Dubai. More knowledge, more education, diversification of venues and types of art, institutional support for artists, more opportunity for the development of local talent in the multicultural, multiethnic reality of Dubai today, etc., etc. Above all, a critical mass of local critical thinking to guide internal developments by considerations other than the uses of art in advertising and marketing.
Since its inception, the merit of Art Dubai has been to bring attention to the visual arts and their possible place in the global-local / center-periphery dialectics of development in Dubai. But things in our post-post modern world do change fast. The time for that initial contribution is already past. The role of the arts in a process of cultural development remains a question and returns as perhaps a new question at each time, given the fact that a time of change and challenges, as it flows, is never identical to itself. Therefore new answers are needed. In culture, as in the economy, as indeed in life itself, growth (that is, development, innovation, creativity) is a condition of survival. May Art Dubai expand in the future, transforming itself with the times, thereby contributing in new ways, practically and conceptually, to the dynamic of the visual arts in Dubai.